Submitted by sandy craine on Tue, 13/10/2015 - 1:08pm
Merrill J Egorin,1,2,3 Dhvani D Shah,1 Susan M Christner,1 Mara A Yerk,4 Kristin A Komazec,4 Leonard R Appleman,2 Robert L Redner,2 Brian M Miller,5 and Jan H Beumer1,6
Abstract
AIMS
Submitted by admin on Mon, 21/09/2015 - 11:46pm
CDF Issues:
Government responds to Cancer Drugs Fund Petition on Blood Cancers
CDF Issues:
Government responds to Cancer Drugs Fund Petition on Blood Cancers
Submitted by admin on Wed, 16/09/2015 - 12:59pm
Whether cancer is maintained by a small number of stem cells or is composed of proliferating cells with approximate phenotypic equivalency is a central question in cancer biology1. In the stem cell hypothesis, relapse after treatment may occur by failure to eradicate cancer stem cells. Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) is quintessential to this hypothesis. CML is a myeloproliferative disorder that results from dysregulated tyrosine kinase activity of the fusion oncoprotein BCR–ABL.
Submitted by admin on Tue, 04/08/2015 - 7:29pm
Nature:
International Weekly Journal of Science
A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs. Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase CML
A Phase III Study of Dasatinib vs. Imatinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase CML
Submitted by admin on Wed, 29/07/2015 - 1:22pm
BCR-ABL1 mutations are a common, well-characterized mechanism of resistance to imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Less is known about mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib and nilotinib, despite increased use because of higher response rates compared with imatinib.
Submitted by sandy craine on Mon, 27/07/2015 - 8:44pm
July 10, 2015 | Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Malignancies, Leukemia & Lymphoma
Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) undergoing treatment with dasatinib had a narrower spectrum of mutations in BCR-ABL1 compared to those treated with imatinib, according to a new study, a finding which could aid in selection of second-line treatments. -
July 10, 2015 | Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hematologic Malignancies, Leukemia & Lymphoma
Patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) undergoing treatment with dasatinib had a narrower spectrum of mutations in BCR-ABL1 compared to those treated with imatinib, according to a new study, a finding which could aid in selection of second-line treatments. -
Submitted by sandy craine on Mon, 27/07/2015 - 8:39pm
Abstract
Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors that has been approved for the first-line treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia, based on the results of a prospective randomized study of nilotinib vs. imatinib (ENESTnd). Apart from this registration study, very few data are currently available on nilotinib first-line. We report here the long-term, 6-year, results of the first investigator-sponsored, GIMEMA multicenter phase II, single-arm, trial with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily as first-line treatment in 73 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Six-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 96%, with one death after progression to blast phase. At 6 years, 75% of the patients were still on nilotinib. The cumulative incidence of major molecular response was 98%; only one patient had a confirmed loss of major molecular response. The cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (MR 4.0) was 76%. Deep molecular response was stable (≥ 2 years) in 34% of these patients. Cardiovascular adverse events, mainly due to arterial thrombosis, occurred in 11/73 patients (15%), after 24 to 76 months of therapy. They were more frequent in elderly patients, and in those with baseline cardiovascular risk factors. None was fatal, although there was a relevant morbidity. This is the study with the longest follow-up of a high dose nilotinib (400 mg twice daily), highlighting the high efficacy and the cardiovascular toxicity of the drug (CTG.NCT.00481052).
Abstract
Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors that has been approved for the first-line treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia, based on the results of a prospective randomized study of nilotinib vs. imatinib (ENESTnd). Apart from this registration study, very few data are currently available on nilotinib first-line. We report here the long-term, 6-year, results of the first investigator-sponsored, GIMEMA multicenter phase II, single-arm, trial with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily as first-line treatment in 73 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Six-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 96%, with one death after progression to blast phase. At 6 years, 75% of the patients were still on nilotinib. The cumulative incidence of major molecular response was 98%; only one patient had a confirmed loss of major molecular response. The cumulative incidence of deep molecular response (MR 4.0) was 76%. Deep molecular response was stable (≥ 2 years) in 34% of these patients. Cardiovascular adverse events, mainly due to arterial thrombosis, occurred in 11/73 patients (15%), after 24 to 76 months of therapy. They were more frequent in elderly patients, and in those with baseline cardiovascular risk factors. None was fatal, although there was a relevant morbidity. This is the study with the longest follow-up of a high dose nilotinib (400 mg twice daily), highlighting the high efficacy and the cardiovascular toxicity of the drug (CTG.NCT.00481052).
Submitted by sandy craine on Mon, 20/07/2015 - 6:34pm
Naoto Takahashi*
Department of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University, Japan
Published: 08 July 2014
ABBREVIATIONS: CML: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; TKIs: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors; CCyR: Complete Cytogenetic Remission; MMR: Major
Molecular Response; ELN; European Leukemia Net; STIM: Stop Imatinib; bcr-abl: breakpoint cluster region-Abelson 1; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction; ASH: American Society of Hematology; TFR: Treatment-Free Remission; QOL: Quality Of Life; MRD: Minimal Residual Disease; BCRP: Breast Cancer Resistance Protein; SNPs: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; GIST: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor; BIM: BCL2-Like
INTRODUCTION
Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib has dramatically improved the prognosis of this condition. However, the cessation of TKI treatment is considered impossible, because in vitro assays show that CML stem cells cannot be eliminated [1]. Clinically, neither Complete Cytogenetic Remission (CCyR) nor a Major Molecular Response (MMR) is sufficient to prevent recurrence after the cessation of medication [2,3]. Furthermore, progression from chronic to acute-phase disease is considered a major risk factor for treatment cessation. Such a progression is difficult to treat with TKI alone; the European Leukemia Net (ELN) guidelines and the hematopoietic tumor guidelines of the Japanese Society of Hematology prohibit TKI treatment cessation in daily practice outside planned clinical research settings [4,5]. On the other hand, treatment effects are reported to be sometimes maintained after incidental or planned treatment cessation prompted by side effects or pregnancy [6-11].
Naoto Takahashi*
Department of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Akita University, Japan
Published: 08 July 2014
ABBREVIATIONS: CML: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia; TKIs: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors; CCyR: Complete Cytogenetic Remission; MMR: Major
Molecular Response; ELN; European Leukemia Net; STIM: Stop Imatinib; bcr-abl: breakpoint cluster region-Abelson 1; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction; ASH: American Society of Hematology; TFR: Treatment-Free Remission; QOL: Quality Of Life; MRD: Minimal Residual Disease; BCRP: Breast Cancer Resistance Protein; SNPs: Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; GIST: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor; BIM: BCL2-Like
INTRODUCTION
Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib has dramatically improved the prognosis of this condition. However, the cessation of TKI treatment is considered impossible, because in vitro assays show that CML stem cells cannot be eliminated [1]. Clinically, neither Complete Cytogenetic Remission (CCyR) nor a Major Molecular Response (MMR) is sufficient to prevent recurrence after the cessation of medication [2,3]. Furthermore, progression from chronic to acute-phase disease is considered a major risk factor for treatment cessation. Such a progression is difficult to treat with TKI alone; the European Leukemia Net (ELN) guidelines and the hematopoietic tumor guidelines of the Japanese Society of Hematology prohibit TKI treatment cessation in daily practice outside planned clinical research settings [4,5]. On the other hand, treatment effects are reported to be sometimes maintained after incidental or planned treatment cessation prompted by side effects or pregnancy [6-11].
Submitted by sandy craine on Fri, 17/07/2015 - 3:09pm
T P Hughes, G Saglio, A Quintás-Cardama, M J Mauro, D-W Kim, J H Lipton, M B Bradley-Garelik, J Ukropec and A Hochhaus
BCR-ABL1 mutations are a common, well-characterized mechanism of resistance to imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Less is known about mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib and nilotinib, despite increased use due to higher response rates compared with imatinib. Retrospective analyses were conducted to characterize mutation development in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib (n=259) or imatinib (n=260) in DASISION, with 3-year minimum follow-up. Mutation screening, including patients who discontinued treatment and patients who had a clinically relevant on-treatment event (no confirmed complete cytogenetic response [cCCyR] and no major molecular response [MMR] within 12 months; five-fold increase in BCR-ABL1 with loss of MMR; loss of CCyR), yielded a small number of patients with mutations (dasatinib, n=17; imatinib, n=18). Dasatinib patients had a narrower spectrum of mutations (4 vs 12 sites for dasatinib vs imatinib), fewer phosphate–binding loop mutations (1 vs 9 mutations), fewer multiple mutations (1 vs 6 patients), and greater occurrence of T315I (11 vs 0 patients). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00481247.
T P Hughes, G Saglio, A Quintás-Cardama, M J Mauro, D-W Kim, J H Lipton, M B Bradley-Garelik, J Ukropec and A Hochhaus
BCR-ABL1 mutations are a common, well-characterized mechanism of resistance to imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). Less is known about mutation development during first-line treatment with dasatinib and nilotinib, despite increased use due to higher response rates compared with imatinib. Retrospective analyses were conducted to characterize mutation development in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib (n=259) or imatinib (n=260) in DASISION, with 3-year minimum follow-up. Mutation screening, including patients who discontinued treatment and patients who had a clinically relevant on-treatment event (no confirmed complete cytogenetic response [cCCyR] and no major molecular response [MMR] within 12 months; five-fold increase in BCR-ABL1 with loss of MMR; loss of CCyR), yielded a small number of patients with mutations (dasatinib, n=17; imatinib, n=18). Dasatinib patients had a narrower spectrum of mutations (4 vs 12 sites for dasatinib vs imatinib), fewer phosphate–binding loop mutations (1 vs 9 mutations), fewer multiple mutations (1 vs 6 patients), and greater occurrence of T315I (11 vs 0 patients). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00481247.
Pages